Dell vs Compaq essays

Dell vs Compaq essays Dell computers are probably a better buy for the money. Dells unique direct-to-customer approach cuts out the middleman, hence passing the savings on to the customer. I would believe that Dell also has better product quality just based on the fact that each computer is built to order instead of Compaqs mass production of the same computer. Delivery speed is really quicker when going through a reseller because you can go get your computer right when you buy it. With Dell you order it and have to wait until it is delivered to your house. With Compaq delivery reliability is as good as your vehicle, but with Dell it is in the hands of UPS or FedEx. Dell is by far the dominant player in changing with demand. Because every computer is built to suit Dell does not feel the change, but Compaq might have thousands of unwanted computers because of mass production of wrong demand. Dell is probably the most flexible because of there built to suit approach. Both companies can achieve successful ne w product introduction through effective marketing tactics. Dell has somewhat competitive advantage in that they focus on build to suit personal computers without a middleman. Compaq has a wide range of products and is just now beginning to sell direct to customers. Compaq does have the ability to mass-produce computers easier because they are all the same, instead of each Dell computer is a little bit different. Dell also offers excellent service and they are servicing the machine that they built. The service with Compaq is provided by the reseller who has to know how to fix every computer that they carry and cannot focus on one particular brand. I believe that Dell has the best chance of success. People are going to learn more and more about computers and will realize that they need their computers built to suit. Understanding computers will customers to decide on the different features that best fit their lifestyl ...

ETHICS AND PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN LEGAL PRACTICE essays

ETHICS AND PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN LEGAL PRACTICE essays In the decades following the Nazi Holocaust of World War II, endeavored to understand the psychology behind mass acceptance of and in large-scale moral atrocities. In 1967, Burt Ross' controversial "Wave" into group identification and blind obedience using high school students to offer insight into Nazi Germany. In 1972, Stanley Milgram designed a (filmed) experiments at Yale University, which dramatically illustrated the susceptibility of otherwise "normal" individuals to perpetrate brutality was ever conducted on the post-war German population, for whom the was initially intended (Luban, p.97). Almost simultaneously, in 1971, Philip Zimbardo conducted another (filmed) experiments at Stanford University that were originally designed investigate the effects of captivity. Unexpectedly, they revealed dramatic relating to the intoxicating power of authority and the acceptance of behavioral realities that had to be terminated very prematurely for the and emotional well being of some of the subjects. Indeed, Zimbardo was so concerned about potential long term psychological trauma from the study maintained regular, periodic consultations with the participants for afterwards. Zimbardo's famous experiment involved the creation of a using undergraduates assigned randomly to be prisoners and prison guards. Under subsequent analysis, the revelations of all these pioneering the roles played by agency, authority, obedience, corruption of judgment, cognitive dissonance theory in human behavior suggest that as many as two- the human population is capable of accepting and participating in horrific conduct under the right circumstances and external influences. The also consistent with the findings of Hannah Arendt (Luban, p.104) who the notorious Nazi war criminal Adolph Eichmann prior to his execution in Israel. In the everyday practice of law, these principles regularly in...

Hinduism And The Caste System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Hinduism And The Caste System - Essay Example Hinduism along with Judaism could realistically be said to be the foundations from which all other religions have sprung. Hinduism unlike Judaism is an open philosophy and it is this openness in its religious philosophy that has given rise to misconceptions about the religion. There is no founder for the Hinduism nor is there any kind of date that can be fixed for when it originated. The religious philosophy of Hinduism is contained in the several holy texts of Hinduism. (Chaudhuri, C. N., 1979). One of the most common misconceptions is that Hinduism has many Gods and also is a collection of many religious forms. This is far from true. Yes there are many Gods that occupy the heavenly abodes in Hinduism, yet all these gods as with all living beings are the result of the is the result of the creation through the sacrifice of the Supreme Viraat Purusha, or Supreme Being or Brahman. Thus the Supreme Being or Brahman is the Truth and the origin off all, present in all and is the one worthy of all worship. (God or gods?). Hinduism in its humility refuses to define this Supreme Being, as it believes it is not possible to define the Infinite in terms of the finite perspective of human beings. The Supreme Being is present in every living being and can be understood by any individual who chooses to seek the Supreme Being and in this is the finding of the Ultimate Truth.